
1B · Diamondbacks
Grade Ildemaro Vargas
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Ildemaro Vargas grades out as a strong 1B for Diamondbacks (B Performance). That places him 21st of 57 graded first basemen. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 59 | .275 | 7 | 37 | .737 | 1 | 60 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 38 | .270 |
Ildemaro Vargas's WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a B performance grade. His 2026 season shows a .275 average across 59 games, a respectable batting line that reflects solid contact skills and pitch recognition for a depth infielder operating in a reserve role. The power production—7 home runs over those 59 contests—sits squarely in the modest range typical of a utility player, signaling he's not a threat in run-scoring situations but capable of contributing occasional long balls off the bench. At an established veteran with ten seasons in professional baseball, Vargas occupies the organizational margins as a reliable bench piece; his strikeout rate of 22 K across 59 games indicates disciplined at-bats without the aggressive upside that typically drives everyday starters. The collision with Max Muncy last week generated sympathetic coverage focused entirely on player safety rather than performance critique, and Arizona's recent spate of depth signings—including Carlos Santana, Gurriel, Clarke, Strowd, Fernandez, and Lawlar in early June—reflects front-office activity aimed at bolstering the roster without suggesting any organizational concern about Vargas's abilities or spot. With the Diamondbacks struggling at 34-34 and facing a compressed playoff push over the final 108 days, Vargas remains exactly what his D+ sentiment grade indicates: a low-visibility depth contributor whose role hinges on team health rather than personal momentum, leaving him in the kind of quiet organizational limbo where solid production goes quietly unremarked.
Ildemaro Vargas ranks 21st of 57 graded first basemen by performance. That slots Ildemaro between Blaze Jordan (B+) just ahead and Yandy Diaz (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Blaze JordanCardinalsB+Buddy KennedyGiantsB+Ty FrancePadresB+Graded lower
Yandy DiazRays| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs LAA | L 0-7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs LAA | W 4-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Ildemaro Vargas is a player on the Diamondbacks roster listed at 1B for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Ildemaro Vargas, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance B, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 3 |
| 19 |
| .675 |
| 0 |
| 31 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 97 | .246 | 1 | 30 | .611 | 9 | 67 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 86 | .252 | 4 | 31 | .667 | 1 | 66 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 10 | .130 | 1 | 4 | .579 | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 53 | .280 | 3 | 19 | .706 | 3 | 52 |
| 2022 | 63 | .263 | 4 | 23 | .691 | 3 | 55 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 9 | .143 | 0 | 2 | .488 | 1 | 3 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 7 | .077 | 0 | 1 | .154 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 18 | .186 | 0 | 4 | .495 | 0 | 8 |
| 2021 | 34 | .156 | 0 | 7 | .438 | 1 | 12 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 8 | .150 | 0 | — | .340 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 10 | .227 | 0 | 2 | .614 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 6 | .222 | 1 | 1 | .778 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 24 | .196 | 1 | 3 | .536 | 0 | 10 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 92 | .269 | 6 | 24 | .712 | 1 | 54 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 14 | .211 | 1 | 4 | .618 | 1 | 4 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 12 | .308 | 0 | 4 | .693 | 0 | 4 |
Recent headlines push Ildemaro Vargas's sentiment grade to a D+, with Arizona's broader season shaping the read. Vargas occupies the organizational margins as a depth infielder—the type of reliable bench piece that generates minimal fan engagement or media oxygen under normal circumstances. The collision with Max Muncy at first base last week dominated local coverage, but the framing was uniformly sympathetic and safety-focused rather than performance-critical; both players were cleared quickly, and the incident became a vehicle for larger MLB safety discussions rather than a referendum on Vargas himself. That neutral-to-sympathetic coverage is doing him a favor: there's no negative noise around his roster spot or abilities, and the Diamondbacks' recent flurry of signings—Gurriel, Clarke, Strowd, Fernandez, Lawlar, and Puk across early June—suggest organizational activity aimed at bolstering depth rather than any signal that Vargas's role is in jeopardy. With Arizona sitting at 34-32 and struggling in the stretch run (1-7 over the last ten games), public attention is fixed on win-loss outcomes and roster construction rather than individual bench contributors, leaving Vargas in low-visibility limbo where his D+ sentiment reflects organizational indifference more than any personal controversy or failure.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Wed, 6/10 | @ MIA | L 0-8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs WAS | L 1-6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs WAS | L 1-14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | vs LAD | W 3-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs LAD | L 0-7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs LAD | L 5-6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |