
#45 RP · Cubs
Height
6'3"
Weight
233 lbs
Age
31
College
N/A
Draft
2013, Rd 1, #22
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Hunter Harvey
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Hunter Harvey grades out as an excellent RP for Cubs (A+ Performance). That places him 5th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A+, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 186 | 3.1904762 | 10-12 | 205 | 1.1111112 | 0.0 | 11 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 4 | 6.75 | 0-1 | 4 | 1.50 | 4.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$6.0M
Guaranteed
$3.6M
AAV
$6.0M/yr
Hunter Harvey's contract earns a A+ Contract Value Index, sitting where relief pitcher deals at this $6M AAV typically resolve. The A+ performance grade reflects elite-level talent in the bullpen — a 7-year veteran and first-round pick (22nd overall, 2013) who was signed as a marquee offseason addition to stabilize the Cubs' backend. At $6M annually for a single year, the structure avoids long-term obligation while the Cubs compete in the regular season (currently 29-18, third seed in the National League Central), making this a classic win-now reliever contract that prioritizes immediate impact over financial hedge. The stark disconnect between his A+ performance grade and his D- sentiment grade isn't a contract problem — it's an availability crisis; a triceps injury landing him on the IL early in the season has drained the goodwill from signing day and forced the Cubs into rapid bullpen replenishment moves, creating the public perception that his absence matters. The good news for the contract's long-term narrative is that sentiment is trending upward from an F, meaning a healthy return to the mound should rehabilitate both his standing and the value perception of the deal itself. At one year and $6M, there's no term risk or dead money overhang — this is a clean, performance-dependent agreement that hinges entirely on whether Harvey can get back to pitching health before the stretch run.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Hunter's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Hunter Harvey ranks 5th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Hunter between Jhoan Duran (A+) just ahead and Craig Kimbrel (A+) just behind.
Graded higher
Jhoan DuranPhilliesA+Bryan HudsonWhite SoxA+Mason MillerPadresA+Graded lower
Craig KimbrelRaysAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Hunter Harvey is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at RP for the Cubs. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Hunter Harvey, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A+, Performance A+, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 12 |
| 0.00 |
| 1-0 |
| 11 |
| 0.66 |
| 10.2 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 43 | 4.20 | 2-4 | 50 | 1.22 | 45.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 6 | 6.35 | 0-0 | 5 | 2.12 | 5.2 | 1 |
| 2024 | 49 | 4.44 | 2-4 | 55 | 1.32 | 50.2 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 57 | 2.82 | 4-4 | 67 | 0.94 | 60.2 | 10 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 38 | 2.52 | 2-1 | 45 | 1.14 | 39.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 9 | 4.15 | 0-0 | 6 | 1.27 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 10 | 4.15 | 0-2 | 6 | 1.15 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 7 | 1.42 | 1-0 | 11 | 1.11 | 6.1 | 0 |
Hunter Harvey has been flat-out dominant when on the mound for the Cubs this season, earning a performance grade that places him among the elite tier of relief arms in the National League. The 31-year-old first-round pedigree — selected 22nd overall back in 2013 — has never been the question; it has always been whether his body would allow the talent to show up consistently, and early in 2026, the Cubs are getting their answer. What makes Harvey's current standing so striking is that his performance grade has held steady at the top of the scale even as his sentiment numbers have cooled sharply over the last 30 days, a disconnect almost certainly driven by his recent IL placement rather than anything he did between the lines. His availability is the defining variable of his career and remains the central anxiety surrounding his value to this Cubs bullpen, and the roster move recalling Charlie Barnes in his place is a concrete reminder that durability concerns are not theoretical for Harvey — they are the recurring storyline of his career. That said, the media framing entering 2026 was explicitly cautiously optimistic rather than dismissive, treating him as a calculated financial bet on a hard-throwing reliever whose pure stuff still commands respect, and nothing about his actual performance has undermined that framing. For a Cubs club sitting at 13-9 with a six-game win streak and positioning themselves in the playoff race with well over 150 games remaining, Harvey's ability to return healthy and sustain that elite production level is one of the more consequential storylines to monitor in the months ahead.
Hunter Harvey's public perception has cratered since signing with the Cubs, sitting at a D- sentiment grade despite being one of the more intriguing offseason additions to a rotation that currently sits at 24-12 and second in the National League Central. The narrative shifted almost immediately from optimistic profile pieces and signing day buzz to a drumbeat of injury updates after a triceps issue landed him on the 15-day IL, draining the goodwill that typically accompanies a first-round pedigree — Harvey was the 22nd overall pick back in 2013 — and a clean offseason move. The disconnect between sentiment and on-field grade couldn't be starker: his performance grade holds at A+, meaning the underlying talent evaluation remains elite, but a reliever who isn't pitching can't rehabilitate public perception no matter how strong his résumé looks on paper. What makes the sentiment hole deeper is that the Cubs have been actively cycling through bullpen arms — signing Phil Maton, Vince Velasquez, Ethan Roberts, and Daniel Palencia in rapid succession — reinforcing the public read that his absence is genuinely felt and that the front office is scrambling to fill a real gap. At $6M AAV, early IL time invites the kind of scrutiny that a mid-contract reliever can usually avoid, and the "hopeful to throw this week" framing in recent coverage signals progress without providing the concrete return date fans and media need to pivot away from the injury story. The good news is that the sentiment trend is moving in the right direction — trending up from an F just weeks ago — so if Harvey gets back on a mound soon, this D- is a floor, not a ceiling, for a Cubs team that still looks built to contend.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.