
#15 C · Rockies
Height
5'11"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
26
College
Memphis
Experience
3 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Hunter Goodman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Hunter Goodman grades out as a strong C for Rockies (B- Performance). That places him 26th of 92 graded catchers. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 296 | 0.24712643 | 61 | 173 | 0.78453374 | 8 | 258 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 60 | .242 | 17 | 31 | .828 | 5 | 55 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Production at catcher earns Hunter Goodman a B- performance grade in the current MLB sample. The 26-year-old fourth-year player is performing at an above-average tier for his position, with his 2026 season numbers — .242 AVG, 17 HR across 60 games — painting the picture of a power-first backstop whose offensive contributions carry real weight despite a strikeout-heavy approach (85 K in that span). His home run production stands as his clearest statistical strength, and recent headlines documenting clutch two-out heroics against Houston underscore that the power translates to high-leverage moments, not just padding counting stats in blowouts. The batting average and elevated strikeout rate represent the offsetting weakness; at .242, he's making contact below league-average thresholds for the position, a concern that aligns with the spring training consistency questions media flagged heading into 2026. His durability on a rookie-scale $0.8M deal has kept him reasonably active, though the team's current nosedive (27-45, mid-season flailing, heavy pitching-side transactions) limits his individual spotlight despite his above-average on-field performance. The Silver Slugger credential from 2025 provides legitimate foundation for the "cautiously optimistic" media narrative, but until Colorado's win column improves, his sentiment and perceived value will remain capped — he's producing at a level that should command more fanbase attention, but the organizational backdrop is working against him.
Hunter Goodman ranks 26th of 92 graded catchers by performance. That slots Hunter between Jake Rogers (B-) just ahead and Sandy LeOn (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jake RogersTigersB-Jesus RodriguezGiantsB-Luis TorrensMetsB-Graded lower
Sandy LeOnBraves| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | @ CHC | W 5-2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/16 | @ CHC | L 4-5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Hunter Goodman is a player in his 3rd MLB season listed at C for the Rockies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Hunter Goodman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance B-, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 144 |
| .278 |
| 31 |
| 91 |
| .843 |
| 1 |
| 150 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 70 | .190 | 13 | 36 | .645 | 1 | 40 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 23 | .200 | 1 | 17 | .633 | 1 | 14 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | vs CHC | L 3-9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu, 6/11 | vs CHC | W 3-2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/7 | vs MIL | L 1-7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs MIL | L 7-9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ LAA | L 4-11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ LAA | W 8-2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ LAA | W 9-8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Sun, 5/31 | vs SF | L 6-19 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |