
#2 SS · Diamondbacks
Height
6'2"
Weight
203 lbs
Age
26
College
N/A
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Geraldo Perdomo
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Geraldo Perdomo grades out as an excellent SS for Diamondbacks (A- Performance). That places him 14th of 60 graded shortstops. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 622 | 0.25161612 | 37 | 247 | 0.7184305 | 69 | 506 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 61 | .232 | 3 | 22 | .678 | 8 | 49 |
| 2025 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$45.0M
Guaranteed
$27.0M
AAV
$11.3M/yr
Geraldo Perdomo produces at a tier that grades a A- performance mark for the Diamondbacks. At 26 years old and in his sixth season, he has established himself as a franchise cornerstone at shortstop, combining above-average two-way contributions with the kind of defensive excellence that registers consistently in game coverage and institutional recognition. His 2025 Silver Slugger award validates the offensive breakout that preceded this season, and the MVP runner-up conversation in current media reflects genuine respect for his overall talent rather than hype inflation. However, his 2026 season numbers tell a more complicated story: across 59 games, he's hitting .230 with 3 home runs and 31 strikeouts, a profile that suggests either a prolonged slump or the tail end of the small-sample volatility that often attends shortstop production in a given stretch. The "getting robbed" narrative that dominates recent coverage—emphasizing bad luck on batted balls rather than poor underlying metrics—implies the underlying quality remains intact, even as the current batting line lags expectations. Arizona's recent roster additions (depth signings across the infield and outfield) read as a front office building around Perdomo as a centerpiece rather than retooling away from him, which reinforces his role as a long-term anchor for the club's competitive window.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Geraldo's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Geraldo Perdomo ranks 14th of 60 graded shortstops by performance. That slots Geraldo between Konnor Griffin (A) just ahead and Taylor Walls (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Konnor GriffinPiratesABo BichetteMetsAColson MontgomeryWhite SoxAGraded lower
Taylor WallsRays| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs LAA | L 0-7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs LAA | W 4-3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Geraldo Perdomo is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at SS for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Geraldo Perdomo, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance A-, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 161 |
| .290 |
| 20 |
| 100 |
| .851 |
| 27 |
| 173 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 98 | .273 | 3 | 37 | .718 | 9 | 92 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 144 | .246 | 6 | 47 | .712 | 16 | 100 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 148 | .195 | 5 | 40 | .547 | 9 | 84 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 11 | .258 | 0 | 1 | .797 | 0 | 8 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | @ MIA | L 0-2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/10 | @ MIA | L 0-8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ MIA | L 6-10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs WAS | L 1-6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs WAS | L 1-14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | vs LAD | W 3-2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs LAD | L 0-7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs LAD | L 5-6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |