
#12 SS · Mets
Height
5'10"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
32
College
N/A
Draft
2011, Rd 1, #8
Experience
11 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Francisco Lindor
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Francisco Lindor grades out as an excellent SS for Mets (A Performance). That places him 8th of 60 graded shortstops. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1559 | 0.27269784 | 281 | 861 | 0.8150418 | 218 | 1685 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 24 | .226 | 2 | 5 | .669 | 2 | 21 |
| 2025 |
Length
10 years
Total Value
$341.0M
Guaranteed
$204.6M
AAV
$34.1M/yr
On tape and in the box score, Francisco Lindor earns an A performance grade among shortstop peers. The elite designation is anchored in his four Silver Slugger selections (2017, 2018, 2023, 2024) and back-to-back All-MLB Second Team honors (2023, 2024), the kind of sustained offensive excellence that defines franchise-caliber production at the position. His 2026 season numbers tell a murkier early story — a .226 AVG with 2 HR and 19 K across 24 games — but this snapshot comes amid a calf strain injury that has sidelined him and forced the Mets into a ten-game losing streak that has poisoned the entire organizational narrative. The gap between his A-tier performance grade and the C- sentiment grade reflects the brutal reality of baseball's win-now math: even elite individual production gets buried under team dysfunction, and Lindor's high salary amplifies every criticism when the franchise is struggling at 30-38 in early June. His injury status looms as the defining variable going forward — if he returns healthy to a Mets team that stabilizes, the chasm between what he's actually producing on the field and how he's being perceived in the court of public opinion should close rapidly, because the underlying talent remains undeniable.
The public narrative around Francisco Lindor has cratered to one of the uglier sentiment stories in the National League right now, though the recent trend is at least moving in the right direction after bottoming out. The Mets' extended losing streak torched Lindor's reputation in the court of public opinion — media voices openly questioned what the franchise shortstop was contributing on the field, former players went on record with sharp criticism, and the organization's decision to drop him down in the batting order became a flashpoint that amplified every doubt. What makes this situation genuinely complicated is that his performance grade tells a completely different story: by any honest on-field evaluation, Lindor is playing at an elite level, which means the sentiment collapse is driven far more by the team's overall dysfunction than by any individual failure on his part. His high salary — the kind that invites scrutiny the moment a team starts losing — has made him a lightning rod for fan frustration, and calls for sweeping roster changes have attached his name to a level of criticism that a four-time Silver Slugger and two-time Gold Glove winner simply doesn't deserve based on production. The Mets' recent roster shuffling, including adding shortstop depth with Ronny Mauricio, has only added fuel to speculation about his standing, and Lindor's injury status becoming a genuine question mark has shifted the conversation from criticism to concern. The bottom line: this is a narrative built almost entirely on team-level failure and injury uncertainty, not individual performance collapse — and if Lindor returns healthy to a Mets team that rights the ship, this sentiment gap between perception and production should close fast.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Francisco's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Francisco Lindor ranks 8th of 60 graded shortstops by performance. That slots Francisco between Anthony Volpe (A) just ahead and Jacob Wilson (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Anthony VolpeYankeesAHa-seong KIMBravesATrea TurnerPhilliesAGraded lower
Jacob WilsonAthleticsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Francisco Lindor is a veteran in his 11th MLB season listed at SS for the Mets. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Francisco Lindor, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance A, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 160 |
| .267 |
| 31 |
| 86 |
| .812 |
| 31 |
| 172 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 152 | .273 | 33 | 91 | .844 | 29 | 169 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 160 | .254 | 31 | 98 | .806 | 31 | 153 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 161 | .270 | 26 | 107 | .788 | 16 | 170 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 125 | .230 | 20 | 63 | .734 | 10 | 104 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 60 | .258 | 8 | 27 | .750 | 6 | 61 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 143 | .284 | 32 | 74 | .853 | 22 | 170 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 158 | .277 | 38 | 92 | .871 | 25 | 183 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 159 | .273 | 33 | 89 | .842 | 15 | 178 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 158 | .301 | 15 | 78 | .793 | 19 | 182 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 99 | .313 | 12 | 51 | .835 | 12 | 122 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.