
#22 3B · Blue Jays
Height
6'0"
Weight
170 lbs
Age
30
College
Virginia
Draft
2017, Rd 4, #132
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Ernie Clement
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Ernie Clement grades out as a strong 3B for Blue Jays (B Performance). That places him 24th of 72 graded third basemen. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B+, good value. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 63 | .303 | 5 | 22 | .767 | 2 | 74 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$4.6M
Guaranteed
$2.8M
AAV
$4.6M/yr
Ernie Clement produces at a tier that grades a B performance mark for the Blue Jays. At 30 years old and five seasons into his career, Clement has solidified himself as a genuine above-average utility contributor — the kind of depth piece who outperforms the replacement-level baseline and earns legitimate respect in a clubhouse. Without specific season statistics provided, the performance grade reflects a player who consistently delivers when his name is called, hitting the moment rather than dominating it; the mediaFraming confirms this assessment, noting his ability to "consistently meet the moment when his number is called" and exceed what raw box scores might suggest. His value flows through reliability and professionalism rather than high-volume production — beat writers emphasize his leadership through adversity and authentic connection with fans, qualities that anchor his B-grade standing even as Toronto's recent roster additions (Barger, Jimenez, Lukes, Fitzgerald) quietly reshape the depth chart around him. At 23-27 and sitting outside a playoff spot with 128 days remaining in the regular season, the Blue Jays need contributors to step up, and Clement's veteran steadiness positions him as a stabilizing force, though the narrative friction around his playing time will likely persist as long as the front office continues to cycle in competition.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Ernie's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Ernie Clement ranks 24th of 72 graded third basemen by performance. That slots Ernie between Santiago Espinal (B) just ahead and MAX Schuemann (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Santiago EspinalDodgersBDeyvison De Los SantosMarlinsBEugenio SuarezRedsBGraded lower
MAX Schuemann| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | @ BOS | W 6-1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun, 6/14 | vs NYY | L 3-8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Ernie Clement is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at 3B for the Blue Jays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Ernie Clement, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance B, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 157 |
| .277 |
| 9 |
| 50 |
| .711 |
| 6 |
| 151 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 139 | .263 | 12 | 51 | .692 | 12 | 114 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 30 | .380 | 1 | 10 | .885 | 1 | 19 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 64 | .200 | 0 | 6 | .485 | 0 | 29 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 6 | .056 | 0 | — | .167 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 70 | .184 | 0 | 6 | .452 | 0 | 30 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 40 | .231 | 3 | 9 | .624 | 0 | 28 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/9 | vs PHI | W 3-2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mon, 6/8 | vs PHI | L 2-5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs BAL | W 6-4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | vs BAL | L 3-13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ ATL | W 7-2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ ATL | L 3-7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ ATL | L 3-4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 5/31 | @ BAL | L 5-9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |