
#47 SP · White Sox
Height
6'4"
Weight
205 lbs
Age
33
College
UNLV
Draft
2014, Rd 1, #18
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Erick Fedde
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Erick Fedde grades out as a poor SP for White Sox (F Performance). That places him 242nd of 252 graded starting pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at F, a significant overpay. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 177 | 4.938628 | 35-60 | 625 | 1.4368231 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 12 | 4.94 | 1-5 | 36 | 1.41 | 58.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.5M
Guaranteed
$900K
AAV
$1.5M/yr
Erick Fedde's return to the White Sox represents a clear case of organizational familiarity trumping performance metrics, as his F-grade reflects the harsh reality of a replacement-level starter trying to salvage what's left of his prime years. At 33, this established veteran is well past the developmental phase where teams typically invest in upside, making his reunion with pitching coach Ethan Bannister more about desperation than genuine optimism about elite production. The modest one-year deal structure perfectly captures the White Sox's hedged bet — they're essentially paying for organizational familiarity and hoping Bannister can unlock something that has eluded Fedde throughout his middling career. Despite being drafted 18th overall in 2014, Fedde has never translated his draft pedigree into consistent big-league success, and at this stage of his career, he's fighting for back-end rotation innings rather than competing for ace-caliber responsibilities. The White Sox's recent flurry of minor signings and roster moves suggests they're casting a wide net for depth pieces, with Fedde fitting squarely into that "prove it" category where modest expectations meet slim organizational investment.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Erick's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Erick Fedde ranks 242nd of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Erick between TY Blach (D) just ahead and Peter LaMbert (F) just behind.
Graded higher
TY BlachCubsDGerman MarquezPadresDColton GordonAstrosDGraded lower
Peter LaMbertAstros| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/3 | @ MIN | W 8-0 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 5/29 | vs DET | W 4-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Erick Fedde is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at SP for the White Sox. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Erick Fedde, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 20 |
| 5.22 |
| 3-10 |
| 63 |
| 1.50 |
| 101.2 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 8.10 | 1-2 | 13 | 1.84 | 23.1 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 7 | 3.38 | 0-1 | 7 | 1.13 | 16.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 32 | 5.49 | 4-13 | 83 | 1.52 | 141.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 21 | 3.11 | 7-4 | 108 | 1.14 | 121.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 3.72 | 2-5 | 46 | 1.20 | 55.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | 31 | 3.30 | 9-9 | 154 | 1.16 | 177.1 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 27 | 5.81 | 6-13 | 94 | 1.63 | 127.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 29 | 5.47 | 7-9 | 128 | 1.44 | 133.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 11 | 4.29 | 2-4 | 28 | 1.37 | 50.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 21 | 4.50 | 4-2 | 41 | 1.46 | 78.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 11 | 5.54 | 2-4 | 46 | 1.53 | 50.1 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 3 | 9.39 | 0-1 | 15 | 2.15 | 15.1 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.