
#10 3B · Giants
Height
6'0"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
27
College
San Diego State
Draft
2020, Rd 2, #49
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Casey Schmitt
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Casey Schmitt grades out as a shaky 3B for Giants (D+ Performance). That places him 56th of 72 graded third basemen. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 276 | 0.24280782 | 35 | 119 | 0.7153536 | 7 | 211 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 55 | .282 | 13 | 35 | .844 | 5 | 61 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Casey Schmitt's performance grade lands at D+, capturing how he stacks up at 3B this season. Through 55 games in 2026, he's posted a .282 average with 13 home runs and 46 strikeouts—solid contact rates that mask a deeper on-field problem: his defensive liability at the hot corner has become a genuine organizational liability, the kind of structural weakness that no amount of offensive competence can hide when the margins are this thin. His strikeout total relative to his games played signals disciplinary concerns at the plate, and when paired with his well-documented defensive struggles—including public criticism from veteran teammates following costly errors—the picture is one of a player whose glove work is actively hurting the team. A fourth-year player at 27 years old, Schmitt has appeared in 55 contests so far, a modest workload that reflects both the team's willingness to cycle options and his own durability questions following recent injury. The prevailing media narrative cast him entering the season as a flexible asset unlocking opportunities for prospects like Bryce Eldridge, yet that same versatility now reads as a tell—a player without a true everyday position is suddenly expendable when the defense craters and an organization begins cycling through veteran reinforcements like it did with the recent signings of Will Brennan, Logan Porter, and multiple pitching acquisitions. With the Giants sitting 14 games below .500 and patching holes throughout the roster, Schmitt's standing has shifted from quiet contributor to genuine roster-bubble risk, and barring a dramatic defensive overhaul in the season's remaining stretch, he's trending toward the margins of organizational confidence.
Casey Schmitt ranks 56th of 72 graded third basemen by performance. That slots Casey between Miguel Vargas (C-) just ahead and Nolan Arenado (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Miguel VargasWhite SoxC-Royce LeWisTwinsC-Darell HernaizAthleticsC-Graded lower
Nolan ArenadoDiamondbacks| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | W 11-10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | L 3-6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Casey Schmitt is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at 3B for the Giants. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Casey Schmitt, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance D+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 95 |
| .237 |
| 12 |
| 40 |
| .706 |
| 0 |
| 74 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 40 | .252 | 6 | 16 | .760 | 0 | 27 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 90 | .206 | 5 | 30 | .579 | 2 | 52 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/9 | vs WAS | L 3-4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mon, 6/8 | @ CHC | W 2-1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ CHC | L 2-3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ CHC | W 18-3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ MIL | W 12-9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ MIL | W 1-0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ MIL | L 3-8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ MIL | L 2-16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |