
#53 SP · Brewers
Height
6'4"
Weight
241 lbs
Age
33
College
Mississippi State
Draft
2014, Rd 11, #326
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Brandon Woodruff
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Brandon Woodruff grades out as an excellent SP for Brewers (A Performance). That places him 17th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A-, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 148 | 3.1238708 | 55-29 | 896 | 1.0335484 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 6 | 3.60 | 2-1 | 25 | 1.03 | 30.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$22.0M
Guaranteed
$13.2M
AAV
$22.0M/yr
Brandon Woodruff grades an A performance mark, with his All-Star caliber stretches anchoring the read. When healthy and active, the 33-year-old right-hander is executing at an elite level — his 25 strikeouts across 6 games in the 2026 season demonstrate his ability to generate swing-and-miss stuff that remains genuinely dangerous in the National League rotation. The core strength here is his command and strikeout production relative to his limited volume, but durability is the elephant in the room: a shoulder inflammation issue forced another IL placement and shortened start, resetting what had been a genuinely encouraging comeback narrative heading into the season. His 2W mark reflects the gap between talent and availability — the stuff is there, the execution is there, but the injury history at age 33 means every start carries risk, and the Brewers front office appears to be hedging that unpredictability by adding multiple arms in recent weeks. The media framing entering 2026 was overtly optimistic about a successful return from previous health issues and strong spring performance, yet that cautious B- sentiment grade reflects the collision between his on-field excellence and the real concern that injuries will again limit his ability to log innings for a team positioned in the playoff race. Woodruff remains a franchise-level arm when on the mound, but the reliability question — not the talent question — now defines how much the Brewers can depend on him down the stretch.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Brandon's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Brandon Woodruff ranks 17th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Brandon between Max Fried (A) just ahead and Zack Wheeler (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Max FriedYankeesAGerrit ColeYankeesAChase DollanderRockiesAGraded lower
Zack WheelerPhilliesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Brandon Woodruff is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at SP for the Brewers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Brandon Woodruff, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A-, Performance A, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 12 |
| 3.20 |
| 7-2 |
| 83 |
| 0.91 |
| 64.2 |
| 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 11 | 2.28 | 5-1 | 74 | 0.82 | 67.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 27 | 3.05 | 13-4 | 190 | 1.07 | 153.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 30 | 2.56 | 9-10 | 211 | 0.96 | 179.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | 3.05 | 3-5 | 91 | 0.99 | 73.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 22 | 3.62 | 11-3 | 143 | 1.14 | 121.2 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 19 | 3.61 | 3-0 | 47 | 1.18 | 42.1 | 1 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 8 | 4.81 | 2-3 | 32 | 1.33 | 43.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.