
#44 RP · Red Sox
Height
6'4"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
38
College
N/A
Experience
16 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Aroldis Chapman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Aroldis Chapman grades out as an excellent RP for Red Sox (A+ Performance). That places him 1st of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A, a clear bargain. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 881 | 2.4779499 | 60-49 | 1354 | 1.0703218 | 0.0 | 379 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 19 | 0.48 | 0-1 | 25 | 0.86 | 18.2 | 12 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$13.3M
Guaranteed
$8.0M
AAV
$13.3M/yr
Aroldis Chapman grades a A+ performance mark, with his All-Star caliber stretches anchoring the read. At 38 years old and in his 17th season, Chapman is defying the typical aging curve for relief pitchers—his 2026 season production of 25 strikeouts across 19 games demonstrates the elite command and stuff that have made him Boston's closer of choice, even as the Red Sox navigate a challenging 27-39 record and fading playoff hopes. The strikeout total speaks to his continued ability to generate swing-and-miss against major league hitters, a hallmark of genuinely elite relief work. The relatively modest games-played sample (19 contests) reflects both his specialized closer role and the Red Sox's earlier-season struggles, which have limited high-leverage opportunities; Chapman's win-loss record remains at 0 wins, a byproduct of pitching for a losing team rather than any indictment of his individual performance. Media coverage has consistently framed his 2025 All-MLB 1st Team selection and Relief Man Award as markers of a genuine renaissance, and his early-season production suggests he remains among baseball's top-tier closers despite entering the twilight of his career. The key question facing Boston's front office isn't Chapman's ability to perform—it's whether investing heavily in relief excellence makes sense for a team that needs foundational offensive and rotation reinforcement to remain competitive.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Aroldis's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Aroldis Chapman ranks 1st of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. Aroldis grades out ahead of names like Bryan Hudson (A+).
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 6/5 | @ NYY | W 5-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Aroldis Chapman is a veteran in his 16th MLB season listed at RP for the Red Sox. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Aroldis Chapman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance A+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 67 |
| 1.17 |
| 5-3 |
| 85 |
| 0.70 |
| 61.1 |
| 32 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 68 | 3.79 | 5-5 | 98 | 1.35 | 61.2 | 14 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 31 | 2.45 | 4-2 | 53 | 1.23 | 29.1 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 30 | 3.72 | 2-3 | 50 | 1.28 | 29.0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 61 | 3.09 | 6-5 | 103 | 1.25 | 58.1 | 6 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 43 | 4.46 | 4-4 | 43 | 1.43 | 36.1 | 9 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 61 | 3.36 | 6-4 | 97 | 1.31 | 56.1 | 30 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | 3.09 | 1-1 | 22 | 0.86 | 11.2 | 3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 60 | 2.21 | 3-2 | 85 | 1.11 | 57.0 | 37 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 55 | 2.45 | 3-0 | 93 | 1.05 | 51.1 | 32 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 52 | 3.22 | 4-3 | 69 | 1.13 | 50.1 | 22 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 31 | 2.01 | 3-0 | 44 | 0.89 | 31.1 | 20 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 28 | 1.01 | 1-1 | 46 | 0.83 | 26.2 | 16 |
| 2016 | 59 | 1.55 | 4-1 | 90 | 0.86 | 58.0 | 36 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 65 | 1.63 | 4-4 | 116 | 1.15 | 66.1 | 33 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 54 | 2.00 | 0-3 | 106 | 0.83 | 54.0 | 36 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 68 | 2.54 | 4-5 | 112 | 1.04 | 63.2 | 38 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 68 | 1.51 | 5-5 | 122 | 0.81 | 71.2 | 38 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 54 | 3.60 | 4-1 | 71 | 1.30 | 50.0 | 1 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 15 | 2.03 | 2-2 | 19 | 1.05 | 13.1 | 0 |