
#23 LF · White Sox
Height
5'9"
Weight
185 lbs
Age
31
College
Arkansas
Draft
2015, Rd 1, #7
Experience
10 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Andrew Benintendi
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Andrew Benintendi grades out as a middling LF for White Sox (C Performance). That places him 58th of 75 graded left fielders. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 10+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1196 | 0.26565337 | 121 | 579 | 0.7496114 | 87 | 1171 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 55 | .240 | 6 | 29 | .711 | 1 | 43 |
| 2025 |
Length
5 years
Total Value
$75.0M
Guaranteed
$45.0M
AAV
$15.0M/yr
Andrew Benintendi's five-year, $75 million deal with the White Sox earns a D+ CVI grade, reflecting a significant overpay for what projects as serviceable starter production. At $15M annually, the White Sox are paying Benintendi like a franchise-caliber outfielder when his recent track record suggests he's more of a solid starter at best — the kind of player who should command closer to $10-12M per year in today's market. Left field isn't a premium defensive position, and Benintendi's offensive profile lacks the power upside typically required to justify this salary tier, especially as he enters his age-29 season. The lengthy five-year commitment compounds the risk, as the White Sox have essentially locked themselves into paying above-market rates through Benintendi's decline years. While he brings consistency and respectable on-base skills, this contract represents the type of middling veteran spending that keeps rebuilding teams stuck in mediocrity rather than investing those resources in player development or higher-impact acquisitions. The White Sox would have been better served either targeting a true difference-maker at this price point or finding comparable production at a fraction of the cost.
Among left fielders on the White Sox, Andrew Benintendi's output grades to a C performance level. The 31-year-old established veteran, now in his 11th season after being a top-10 draft pick in 2015, has delivered below-average production in 2026 that reflects both his diminished availability and his on-field struggles when in the lineup. His 2026 season line of .240 AVG, 6 HR, and 56 K across 55 games tells the story: a contact hitter whose batting average has cratered and whose power remains minimal, a sharp decline from the form that earned him a Gold Glove in 2021. The durability issue has been the more pressing concern this season — another injured list stint continues a pattern of availability problems that has haunted his tenure in Chicago, limiting him to just 55 games when the team needs steady outfield production. At $15M in salary, the gap between Benintendi's actual output and his contract cost has become increasingly difficult to justify, and the organization's recent acquisitions of Austin Hays, Everson Pereira, and Dylan Campbell signal an active reshuffling of the outfield depth chart that points away from his future with the club. His reputation as a positive clubhouse presence offers some mitigation, but with winter trade discussions already surfacing and his on-field production landing squarely in below-average territory, his days wearing a White Sox uniform appear numbered.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Andrew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Andrew Benintendi ranks 58th of 75 graded left fielders by performance. That slots Andrew between Alejandro Osuna (C+) just ahead and Nathan Church (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Alejandro OsunaRangersC+Tommy TroyDiamondbacksC+Carlos CortesAthleticsCGraded lower
Nathan Church| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | @ NYY | L 2-12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/14 | vs LAD | W 6-4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Andrew Benintendi is a veteran in his 10th MLB season listed at LF for the White Sox. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Andrew Benintendi, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance C, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 116 |
| .240 |
| 20 |
| 63 |
| .738 |
| 1 |
| 101 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 135 | .229 | 20 | 64 | .685 | 3 | 109 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 151 | .262 | 5 | 45 | .682 | 13 | 147 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 93 | .320 | 3 | 39 | .785 | 4 | 111 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 33 | .254 | 2 | 12 | .735 | 4 | 29 |
| 2022 | 126 | .304 | 5 | 51 | .772 | 8 | 140 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 134 | .276 | 17 | 73 | .766 | 8 | 136 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 14 | .103 | 0 | 1 | .442 | 1 | 4 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 138 | .266 | 13 | 68 | .774 | 10 | 144 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 148 | .290 | 16 | 87 | .831 | 21 | 168 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 151 | .271 | 20 | 90 | .776 | 20 | 155 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 34 | .295 | 2 | 14 | .835 | 1 | 31 |
Andrew Benintendi's public standing has settled into a quietly skeptical place — his sentiment grade has been trending upward from its low point, but a C- still reflects a fanbase and media landscape that has largely lost patience with his tenure on the South Side. The dominant narrative driving that skepticism is a familiar one: another injured list stint in 2026 reinforces a concerning pattern of availability issues that has defined his time in Chicago, and at a $15M salary, the organization's willingness to absorb that absence grows thinner by the month. His C performance grade suggests the on-field production, when available, lands in solidly below-average territory — not catastrophically bad, but not the kind of output that quiets the contract criticism either, and his 2021 Gold Glove feels like a distant credential at this point. The White Sox' recent roster activity — adding outfielder Austin Hays, Everson Pereira, and Reese McGuire in a flurry of moves — paints a picture of an organization actively reshuffling its depth, which only amplifies the trade speculation surrounding Benintendi and signals the front office is not standing pat while waiting for him to return. His positive clubhouse reputation, noted consistently in coverage, is the one genuine counterweight keeping the narrative from going fully negative, and his return to action this week may briefly reset the conversation — but with winter trade discussions already surfacing and the team sitting at 17-20, the honest read is that Benintendi's days in Chicago feel numbered, and the public mood has largely accepted that outcome.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sun, 6/7 | @ PHI | L 5-9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ PHI | W 6-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ PHI | L 6-8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ MIN | W 8-0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ MIN | L 4-6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ MIN | L 6-9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Sun, 5/31 | vs DET | W 2-1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 5/30 | vs DET | W 7-1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |